Phase 01
CFD Sweep
Hundreds of tube profiles and fork crowns are modeled digitally before a single mold is cut.
Simulation stack
CFD to race telemetry
We only keep gains that survive prototype builds, controlled testing, and pro rider feedback.
Program cycle
18 months
Validation
An empty bike tests well. A real bike, with bottles, rider position, and wheel choice, is where engineering gets honest. We test the full system and adjust surface transitions to reduce disturbed airflow in the places that matter most.
Phase 01
Hundreds of tube profiles and fork crowns are modeled digitally before a single mold is cut.
Phase 02
We validate at realistic yaw angles, then re-shape cockpit and head tube transitions until turbulence falls away.
Phase 03
Telemetry, split-time deltas, and rider feedback decide whether the gain reaches production.
Materials lab
Our carbon schedules are not generic “high modulus” claims. Each zone is tuned for the job it does: power transfer at the bottom bracket, calm steering up front, resilience over harsh surfaces, and lower mass everywhere else.
AeroCore Carbon
We reinforce the down tube and BB shell for explosive acceleration, then taper the layup through the seat cluster and fork blades so the rider keeps traction and confidence at speed.
Bench testing
Every prototype survives a fatigue protocol that exceeds race load expectations before it reaches an athlete test fleet.
Resin system
Thermal stability keeps alignment exact during long descents, rooftop transport, and race-day heat.
Hardware strategy
Integrated does not mean inaccessible. Our routing architecture preserves a clean front end without punishing routine service.
Systems integration
Cockpit
Bar width, hood angle, and stem stack are fitted before paint so the finished bike already matches the rider’s position.
Drivetrain
Electronic groupset routing is isolated from frame flex points to keep shifting precise even under peak sprint loads.
Wheel strategy
Each frame is tested with multiple rim depths so crosswind stability stays predictable, not just fast in straight-line conditions.
01
We collect the rider’s target posture and power style before selecting cockpit and crank dimensions.
02
We test the precise build mix rather than generic frame-only assumptions.
03
Rider changes, bottle placement, and wheel swaps are folded into the final evaluation.
04
Only repeatable gains that survive production tolerances make it to launch.
Race case study
When the peloton split in violent side winds, our test team tracked power and speed against the prior generation. The Vengeance RS delivered the same pace for lower rider cost, preserving the legs that mattered in the final sprint.
Avg. saving
12W
Crosswind delta
+6%
Rider note
More composure